Sanchez and Viscarra add to the study of workplace discrimination against Latinos by challenging the notion that Latinos would be unwilling to relocate to other places in case of job placement. Specifically, the researchers found out that personal consideration in career affects inferences on racism and relocation intents. In essence, ethnic connotations seem to play an important part in determining which factors constitute racial discrimination in the workplace. Hence, Sanchez and Viscarra, conclude, “organizations interested in diversifying their workforce may encounter additional obstacles when attempting to recruit Hispanics residing in areas heavily populated by their respective ethnic subgroup” (56). They suggest that organizations should look into ways of fostering cultural diversity through creation of positive work climates. Snachez and Viscarra, opine that lost social cohesion could be compensated for by instituting in-house racial support systems that would attract the Hispanic workforce.
The Hispanics are referred to as foreign people, non-white and Catholics by the Anglo-Saxon, white and protestant American writers. The Americans believe that they are racially superior to the Hispanics. The Hispanic-Mexicans were labeled as mongrel breed, a rather abusive term, and were not allowed to enter American neighborhoods (Duany, 2010). Discrimination against the Hispanics It is believed that Hispanic discrimination resulted in the congressional debate that covered illegal immigration. Their illegal immigration marred with their colonizing America makes them objects of discrimination.
According to Hispanic American Culture (2006). They have been deprived of justice by being left without the Double Jeopardy Clause which protects against three diverse abuses: a second trial for the similar crime after release; a second tribunal for the similar crime after conviction; and manifold punishments for the same offense. Reverse discrimination occurs when a group is regularly advantaged or considered the mainstream is treated less favorably in favor of a marginal group. Within the United States and lots of other countries, there is a long history of discrimination against certain races or classes of people which has affected the Hispanics in that the Hispanics treated less favorably than non-Hispanics. They have also experienced other forms of discrimination like redlining which is the practice of arbitrarily denying or restraining pecuniary services to precise neighborhoods, commonly because its inhabitants are people of color or are underprivileged (ô2-6).
The first essay, using a fixed-effects Poisson model, examines discrimination in the number of houses shown to homeseekers in 2000. Unlike previous studies, it takes into account auditors' actual socioeconomic characteristics to minimize the estimation bias. The results indicate that blacks and Hispanics are shown 30 and 10 percent fewer units, respectively, than whites. In contrast, no similar discrimination against Asians and Native Americans is found. The results also show that since 1989, discrimination against blacks has increased by 12 percentage points while discrimination against Hispanics has been unchanged. In addition, this paper finds that brokers discriminate mainly because of white customers' prejudice.
and there are some states passing laws against Hispanics ..
In the third essay, a bivariate probit model is used to examine the current status of and recent changes in discrimination motives and brokers' marketing behaviors. The results show that black and Hispanic homebuyers are discriminated against because of the prejudice of both brokers and white customers. In addition, white customers' prejudice has increased over the last decade. Regarding brokers' marketing behaviors, the most striking results points to the existence of and an increasing trend in redlining (i.e., brokers withhold housing units in integrated neighborhoods from homeseekers).
Racism Against Hispanics Free Essays
Although nearly all of Karabel’s study is focused on the earlier history of admissions policy at Harvard, Yale, and Princeton, with the developments of the last three decades being covered in just a few dozen pages, he finds complete continuity down to the present day, with the notorious opacity of the admissions process still allowing most private universities to admit whomever they want for whatever reasons they want, even if the reasons and the admissions decisions may eventually change over the years. Despite these plain facts, Harvard and the other top Ivy League schools today publicly deny any hint of discrimination along racial or ethnic lines, except insofar as they acknowledge providing an admissions boost to under-represented racial minorities, such as blacks or Hispanics. But given the enormous control these institutions exert on our larger society, we should test these claims against the evidence of the actual enrollment statistics.
Below is an essay on "Discrimination Against Hispanic Americans" from Anti Essays, your source for research papers, essays, and term paper examples.
Free Discrimination Essays and Papers
Hispanics who had served with honor and distinction in World War II had no desire to resume lives filled with prejudice and employment barriers for themselves or their families. Following the war, many political, business, and civil rights organizations formed to help fight discrimination, segregation (using laws or social customs to separate certain social groups, such as whites and people of color) and racism (prejudice against people of a particular physical trait, such as skin color). Two of the more prominent groups were the Mexican American Political Association and the American GI Forum. These early groups grew into larger and more influential groups such as the National Council of La Raza (see box) that organized in the 1950s and 1960s.