I only worship one God but I may honor any teacher. I think it is incorrect to try and make a comparison of both religions. When the Buddha was asked if he was a god he said no. When asked to resurrect a child he made the mother understand that death is also part of life (before you jump the gun and start thinking that Jesus overcame death, keep in mind that Jesus was not on earth at that time. Therefore resurrection in the Buddha’s time was unheard of.). In my opinion Jesus commanded his followers to love one another but did not leave any instructions on how to cultivate love. He instructs them to be cheerful and full of joy but did not leave instructions on how. If you have studied Buddhism as you claim you would know that there are meditations on Love, Compassion, Joy and Equanimity. If God commanded you to build a structure in his name you would have to close the Bible and open a book made by man (architect) even if that person was not a Christian. In doing and in following their instructions you are honoring that person.
Some say that worshiping the Buddha is idolatry…I say that it is. But being that he never claimed to be a god those people are mistaken. (Example: if I manufacture a glass ball just to be a glass ball and you decide to worship it as a god or your god then you are committing idolatry. The glass ball is not an idol but the object of your idolatry. Now if I create a glass ball to be a god or my god, even if you or no one worships it, it remains an idol.) Many Christians have erred and unjustly claimed the Buddha to be a false god. This is slander at its worse for Christians wish to further the Christian agenda while defaming a another figure who is not around to defend himself or his teachings. (I bet that I can find any number of persons that I can convince into believing you (evidencetobelieve) are a god. These people may continue to worship you even if you claim not to be a god. Would you still be an idol or just the object of idolatry?
In my opinion the Buddha did overcome suffering that is what he claims to be about. “Suffering is what I teach and how to end it.” He does not teach nor did he promise salvation in the sense of everlasting life in heaven. He promised a formula on how to stop suffering here and now. The middle path (for natural suffering) and non attachment (for mental suffering). You mentioned inaction as a requisite but you have misled people in only stating that part. The Noble Eightfold Path mentions right actions as right speech, thought, physical actions etc. Performing good deeds (giving alms to the poor would have good consequences for the person. Not performing evil deeds would protect the person from revenge and punishment.) All this you left out and much more.
Keith Alves Page 1 of 11 Reflection Two Philosophy 104 Comparative Analysis of Christianity and Buddhism Worldviews. The purpose of this essay is to briefly.
You present the ideas of Christianity very well, but you are lacking correct knowledge of both science and Buddhism. I am a registered Dharma Teacher, so I know. The main teaching is the three characteristics: emptiness, impermanence, and dissatisfaction. Emptiness means there is no ego-soul. If you attained samadhi in meditation then you would realize this fact, which I doubt you have. If there is no soul, there is no original sin. If there is no original sin, then Christ could not redeem us from it… You also say that Buddha does not expiate our karma (no karma is not cause and effect). Yet we have the light of Amitabha Buddha which does just that. We also have Kuan Yin, which much like Christ, can save us from the depths of hell… There is so much about Buddhism you apparently don’t understand. If you want to be Christian that is your choice, but please don’t misrepresent a religion you know little about.
In Plum Village, where many people from different religious backgrounds come to practice, it is not difficult to see that sometimes a Buddhist recognizes a Christian as being more Buddhist than another Buddhist. I see a Buddhist, but the way he understands Buddhism is quite different from the way I do. However, when I look at a Christian, I see that the way he understands Christianity and practices love and charity is closer to the way I practice them than this man who is called a Buddhist. The same thing is true in Christianity. From time to time, you feel that you are very far away from your Christian brother. You feel that the brother who practices in the Buddhist tradition is much closer to you as a Christian. So Buddhism is not Buddhism and Christianity is not Christianity. There are many forms of Buddhism and many ways of understanding Buddhism. There are many ways of understanding Christianity. Therefore, let us forget the idea that Christianity must be like this, and that Buddhism can only be like that.
We don't want to say that Buddhism is a kind of Christianity and Christianity is a kind of Buddhism. A mango can not be an orange. I cannot accept the fact that a mango is an orange. They are two different things. Vive la difference. But when you look deeply into the mango and into the orange, you see that although they are different they are both fruits. If you analyze the mango and the orange deeply enough, you will see small elements are in both, like the sunshine, the clouds, the sugar, and the acid. If you spend time looking deeply enough, you will discover that the only difference between them lies in the degree, in the emphasis. At first you see the difference between the orange and the mango. But if you look a little deeper, you discover many things in common. In the orange you find acid and sugar which is in the mango too. Even two oranges taste different; one can be very sour and one can be very sweet.
Free Essay Reviews - Essay Judge
"We don't want to say that Buddhism is a kind of Christianity and Christianity is a kind of Buddhism. A mango can not be an orange. I cannot accept the fact that a mango is an orange. They are two different things. Vive la difference. But when you look deeply into the mango and into the orange, you see that although they are different, they are both fruits."
Buddhist Articles - View on Buddhism
On the other hand, it may not be a bad idea to look at what we can learn from each other: the beautiful Christian practice of helping others in need is just as useful to Buddhists, as Buddhist meditation techniques can help Christians. Apart from the differences, one should recognise the many similarities as well. Ethics are defined quite similarly in both systems and the need for love and compassion are emphasised in both.
The dialogue between Buddhism and Christianity has not gone very far, in my opinion, because we have not been able to set up a solid ground for such dialogue. This is a reflection of the present situation.
Buddhists believe in reincarnation, the possibility for human beings to live several lives. In Buddhist circles, we do not use the word incarnation very much: we use the word rebirth. After you die, you can be reborn and can have another life. In Christianity, your life is unique, your only chance for salvation. If you spoil it, then you will never get salvation. You have only one life.
Buddhism teaches that there is non-self, anatta. Christianity clearly teaches that a Christian is a personalist. Not only are you a person, self, but God is a person, and He has a self. The Buddhist teaching of emptiness and no substance sounds like the teaching of no being. Christianity speaks of being, of existence. The teaching of St. Thomas Aquinas speaks of the philosophy of being, la philisophie de l'etre, the confirmation that the world is.
There is compassion and loving-kindness in Buddhism, which many Christians believe to be different from the charity and love in Christianity. Charity has two aspects: your love directed to God, and your love directed to humankind. You have to learn how to love your enemy. Our Christian friends have a tendency to remind us that the motivation of love is different for Christians and Buddhists. There are theologians who say that Buddhists practice compassion just because they want liberation; that Buddhists don't really care about the suffering of people and other living beings; that they are only motivated by the desire to be liberated. In Christianity, your love is grounded in God. You love God, and because God said that you must love your neighbor, so you love your neighbor. Your love of your neighbor springs from the ground of your love of God.
Many people, especially in Christian circles, say that there are things in common between Christianity and Buddhism. But many find that the philosophical foundations of Christianity and Buddhism are quite different. Buddhism teaches rebirth, many lives. Christianity teaches that only this one life is available to you. Buddhism teaches that there is no self, but in Christianity there is a real self. Buddhism teaches emptiness, no substance, while Christianity confirms the fact of existence.
If the philosophical ground is so different, the practice of compassion and loving kindness in Buddhism and of charity and love in Christianity is different. All that seems to be a very superficial way of seeing. If we have time and if we practice our own tradition well enough and deeply enough, we will see that these issues are not real.
What did Lord Buddha really have to say about God
So you deride Buddhism for not having proof of the afterlife then quote the bible as your “proof” of an afterlife. How backwards can you get? Focus on your own faith and practice instead of sitting around and worrying about what someone else believes or doesn’t believe. It’s none of your business and the world would be a better place without judgmental Christians who think they know all the answers.