Science vs Religion - Essay by Blossom746 - Anti Essays

Changes in religious beliefs are very different from changes in scientific beliefs.

People have, therefore, got to realise that there is no real conflict between science and religion. Their approach towards life is, of course different but the goal is the same. Science follows the path of reason and intellect, religion travel the road of faith and belief. But both aim at the discovery of truth.

Everyone has heard the debate. Is science or religion right? Which one is better? Are they both right? There are so many different ways to tackle such a topic. Let me begin by saying that I champion both. They both have pros and cons and so too should an analysis of both. Does one have more pros and less cons than the other? That's for you to decide.

... Bible on the topic of creation, it states that God created man; Adam using dust, and woman; Eve using a piece of Adam's rib. This concept is what is taught by most religions and what most people believe. Scientists and philosophers later came up with the theory of ...

Below is an essay on

With the decline of Islamic Civilizations in the late Middle Ages and the rise of Europe, the Islamic scientific tradition shifted into a new period. Institutions that had existed for centuries in the Muslim world looked to the new scientific institutions of European powers.[] This changed the practice of science in the Muslim world, as Islamic scientists had to confront the western approach to scientific learning, which was based on a different philosophy of nature. From the time of this initial upheaval of the Islamic scientific tradition to the present day, Muslim scientists and scholars have developed a spectrum of viewpoints on the place of scientific learning within the context of Islam, none of which are universally accepted or practiced. However, most maintain the view that the acquisition of knowledge and scientific pursuit in general is not in disaccord with Islamic thought and religious belief.

Leftists gush over “science” but hold to it as a religion

From an Islamic standpoint, science, the study of , is considered to be linked to the concept of (the Oneness of God), as are all other branches of knowledge. In , nature is not seen as a separate entity, but rather as an integral part of Islam's holistic outlook on God, humanity, and the world. The Islamic view of science and nature is continuous with that of religion and God. This link implies a sacred aspect to the pursuit of scientific knowledge by Muslims, as nature itself is viewed in the Qur'an as a compilation of signs pointing to the Divine. It was with this understanding that science was studied and understood in Islamic civilizations, specifically during the eighth to sixteenth centuries, prior to the colonization of the Muslim world. , in , asserts that the very existence of science, as it is understood in the modern sense, is rooted in the scientific thought and knowledge that emerged in Islamic civilizations during this time. , an , was an early proponent of the concept that a must be proved by based on confirmable procedures or —hence understanding the scientific method 200 years before . Ibn al-Haytham described his theology:

Religion has been guiding the society for thousands of years

As per , another explanation for the creation is based on the : earth, water, fire, air and . The Hindu religion traces its beginnings to the sacred Vedas. Everything that is established in the Hindu faith such as the gods and goddesses, doctrines, chants, spiritual insights, etc. flow from the poetry of . The Vedas offer an honor to the sun and moon, water and wind, and to the order in Nature that is universal. This naturalism is the beginning of what further becomes the connection between Hinduism and science.

The historical process of Confucianism has largely been antipathic towards scientific discovery. However the religio-philosophical system itself is more neutral on the subject than such an analysis might suggest. In his writings On Heaven, espoused a proto-scientific world view. However, during the Han Synthesis the more anti-empirical was favored and combined with skepticism regarding the nature of reality. Likewise, during the Medieval period, argued against technical investigation and specialization proposed by Chen Liang. After contact with the West, scholars such as would rely on Buddhist/Daoist skepticism to denounce all science as a subjective pursuit limited by humanity's fundamental ignorance of the true nature of the world. After the , attempts to modernize Confucianism and reconcile it with scientific understanding were attempted by many scholars including and . Given the close relationship that Confucianism shares with Buddhism, many of the same arguments used to reconcile Buddhism with science also readily translate to Confucianism. However, modern scholars have also attempted to define the relationship between science and Confucianism on Confucianism's own terms and the results have usually led to the conclusion that Confucianism and science are fundamentally compatible.

affordable care act essay Science Vs Religion Essay hurricane katrina essay essay writers block

Science taught human-beings to examine things scientifically

This “scientific” logic is terribly flawed. While we both agree to believe Australia is there without ever visiting it ourselves, we also have the option of verifying this fact upon our own experimentation or by various evidence of proofs that don’t rely on personal testimony, meaning that at any point I can go and visit Australia or look at data that would verify it’s existence. The same cannot be said about God unfortunately. Ultimately, it seems to me that you’re applying an Existential perspective to your religious belief which in in its very nature is contradictory to belief in general.

This paper will examine the scientific view verse religion. I feel their support for the big picture is shallow and untenable. I believe in science but I also have faith.

Hi Dougal, if we assume for a moment that the collective testament is truthful to the described experience, can you, or the scientific method give an evidence based counter explanation for the hundreds of thousands who argue the cause of speaking in tongues as a supernatural experience? Is testimony not a legitimate source of evidence, and made even more plausible when independently collected? I would dismiss it more willingly if the testimony was constructed by a single organisation and hierarchy, but this simply isn’t the case. Individuals, unrelated to religious sect or institution have witnessed to the same experience over the past 2000 years. If you agreed, (which I assume you don’t) then surely the scientific community would be more fascinated to explain such a phenomenon and not just mock those who claim it be spiritual?

I predict we will find very different patterns of brain activity when comparing religion and science cognitively, ..

When talking about tongues, it is important to understand it is a gift, that some believers receive this gift in particular, while others may receive the gift of pure faith no matter the circumstances. Others receive the gift of visions and so on. Speaking in tongues is not the ultimate of being a Christian. Also, for everyone in this thread, science has yet to prove anything against God. Infact, science has only proven God to exist even more! Speaking in tongues, for example, involves chemical changes in the body, which God is known to be able to do!
Kenneth Hagin, a rebound preacher was diagnosed of an incurable blood disease, yet after having a vision and understanding what he must do, when he awoke all signs of sickness were gone. He was practically dead, full of sickness, yet the pain is what brought him closers to God. People on this thread ask why God allows suffering. Perhaps He allows it because it is during these times that he is able to become closer with us. John G Lake, also a rebound preacher in the twentieth century, ran healing ministries, where people dying of disease and sickness were instantly cured by his preachings. Also facts from the Bible are constantly being verified.
The book of Genesis sounds a lot like the big bang, how would someone 2000 years ago understand a topic unless he is truly of God?
The Bible explains how entire civilizations were wiped out, Viking remnants have been found in North America that would precede native Americans by thousands of years! Atlantis, another city that was wiped out, and science is just now beginning to catch up!
All science has done and will continue to do is attempt to explain God’said creation. Spirituality and science can coexist, it’s unfortunate for those who believe otherwise.